Comments on: Hollywoodent http://hollywoodent.edublogs.org/2008/04/18/catching-up-keeping-up/ "You shouldn't believe in an ism, you should believe in yourself" F.Bueller 1986 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:02:18 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: [Blocked by CFC] Maisie http://hollywoodent.edublogs.org/2008/04/18/catching-up-keeping-up/comment-page-1/#comment-30 [Blocked by CFC] Maisie Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:02:18 +0000 http://hollywoodent.edublogs.org/2008/04/18/catching-up-keeping-up/#comment-30 Hi. If you don't know where you are going, you will probably end up somewhere else. I am from Syria and also now teach English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Ex-dividend traders have treated that ministers prefer usually relatively receive new stores." With respect :), Maisie. Hi. If you don’t know where you are going, you will probably end up somewhere else.
I am from Syria and also now teach English, give true I wrote the following sentence: “Ex-dividend traders have treated that ministers prefer usually relatively receive new stores.”

With respect :) , Maisie.

]]> By: Andrew http://hollywoodent.edublogs.org/2008/04/18/catching-up-keeping-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Andrew Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:33:26 +0000 http://hollywoodent.edublogs.org/2008/04/18/catching-up-keeping-up/#comment-19 the whole weighing a review based on the publication and the weight it has in the industry makes sense to me, but the part about some critics "writing better, more detailed, more articulate articles" doesn't. though i guess peter travers calling everything "explosive" isn't exactly enlightening. the saddest part is that ebert and corliss (and maybe even travers. who knows?) are actually smart guys who aren't allowed to be smart. there's a lot to talk about here, and i'm sure we will in the future, but overall, i would agree with your first two sentences. ps - do you get extra credit if people comment on this? the whole weighing a review based on the publication and the weight it has in the industry makes sense to me, but the part about some critics “writing better, more detailed, more articulate articles” doesn’t. though i guess peter travers calling everything “explosive” isn’t exactly enlightening.

the saddest part is that ebert and corliss (and maybe even travers. who knows?) are actually smart guys who aren’t allowed to be smart.

there’s a lot to talk about here, and i’m sure we will in the future, but overall, i would agree with your first two sentences.

ps – do you get extra credit if people comment on this?

]]>