Entries Tagged 'reality' ↓

PvP

Interestingly, artists used to go to war. The First Motion Picture Unit was a collabo between LtCol. Jack Warner, of Warner Brothers, and the U.S. Army. Those who were able avoided the draft by making propagandist films for the govt. Not surprisingly, Ronald Reagan was in a bunch of them. More surprising is that Dr. Seuss was all over the FMPT, even producing an Academy Award winning documentary Design for Death. (He also published numerous political cartoons, which I have already purchased and will share with you when it arrives)
Seems many of the greats have seen combat (Vonnegut, Orwell, Stone) but this marriage tween military and media only reinforces the fact that Paris Hilton is the Illuminati.

SOC Draft

I think I was tricked into entering the world of online dating. Again.

Before I defend myself, watch the video below. (It’s 50 seconds long, I’ll understand if you can’t spare the time, here is one 26 seconds, less convincing, though)

It was a dark night.

Ok, let me break this down for a minute (keep in mind every speaking role in this clip is male):

“The key to eHarmony is that you don’t have to do any heavy lifting”. Has me from hello. I’m in.

“I don’t have to feel the pressure to go out and search for people” Well at this point, I’d rather not put my pants back on, so. Still in.

“Dating sites give you a picture and a paragraph, at eHarmony we do the matching for you, based on who you are at the deepest levels” This is like, so easy.

Insert: diagonally swirling text. 29 Dimensions

Now listen up! this is who you are. (If you’d really like to know the full you, visit each of the wiki sites attached to these words. They’re long. We are, after all, allegedly complex creatures)

Emotion. Industry. Values. Vitality. Intellect. Dominance. Sociability. Curiosity. Self Concept. Appearance. Character. Industry. Ambition. (what’s that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5…14)

Well it isn’t 29 but that’s all I can see. Seems fair enough, Though I thought I was bypassing sociability by using this site. I also apparently don’t have the industry, or the ambition to link you to all of those. But if you really care, you’ll set aside the afternoon and brush up on you.

“Somewhere in all those questions, they’ve deciphered that she’s the right girl for me”

This dude isn’t even looking at his ‘girlfriend’. “She loves me for who I am”. You=kind of googly eyed.

“You don’t have to sacrifice anything.” Not even considering looking at his ‘girlfriend’.

” And it does work, I’m not sure I care how it works, it just does.”

I always was under the impression that these types of sites were for people who simply lacked the social skills required to court someone but were quite skilled at the whole typing thing. I was right.

by visiting this site used for “social bookmarking”

when I visited eharmony I had no matches. This is much easier. Though I saw a commercial saying that millions of others get rejected from that site as well. I am not alone. Well I might be, but so are millions of others. That site really doesn’t allow someone to feel good about themselves. Unless it works, which apparently it does. What more is there to dating and identity than likes and dislikes? Obviously a questionaire has the foresight to include such habits as “sometimes accidentally burps the stinkiest burps imaginable very quietly in public”.

All that nonsense aside, it appears that my perfect match is the username wadh0007. Unlike digg, delicious doesn’t allow users to post photos of themselves, which is lucky, as I would hate for this person that I could certainly enjoy a substantially long dinner, well balanced, healthy, I’m guessing there would be meat it in.

I must warn you that this is about to get a little creepy. The place where I go ahead and imagine what this person looks like. Maybe I shouldn’t do this. I wont. I should, in fact, delete this.

I have no idea if this is a man or a woman.

I don’t know if any of you will care about this stuff as it refers very little to this blog about entertainment, or rather at this point, claims to refer to entertainment but is thus far full of commentary on blogger stuff. But if you agreed with me on any of those things it’s possible that you’ll agree about some generally interesting stuff. Am I supposed to be writing this blog like people are reading it? I don’t have any readers yet, who the hell am I talking to?

Punk Musician, Ex-Alcoholic, Parent, Yogic,

Lisa Ling, it’s very likely a man with good taste. Cutest one on The View. By far. Also has been on Channel One when I was in 6th grade. I guess I’ll have to settle for a best friend.

In fact I’m going to paint her. Oh God, is this one of those things where the image I have of this girl is going to adhere to some conventions trained into me by girls like Kelly Kapowski and Buffy Summers. oh, and Jennifer Love Hewitt. And Alicia Silverstone.

This is all of course if you equate common interests to compatibility. Or maybe this is like is two people love oreos and one likes the cookie part and one like the cream. but the one who likes the cookie also likes a little bit of spit on one side. or only one of the halves. whatever.

Wadh has 102 tags. 2 about a 9/11 conspiracy. Health was the most tagged at 12.

http://www.sfwa.org/writing/chadvce.htm is a good resource for my readers, who are just my class at this point.

Political for sure.

The only mention of movies is a link to a site of videos taken in Iraq by soldiers and reporters alike.